Action for Public Transport (N.S.W.) Inc. |
APTNSW also called on the Inquiry to look carefully at who is served by its identification of “planning and zoning rules” as a priority for reform. It suggests that the statements on which the Inquiry relies come in the main from a handful of developer lobby groups keen to develop outside established centres. The group says that “concentrating activity in well-established centres is good for the passengers we represent, as services to central points can be, and usually are, more frequent and direct. It argues that there is less competition, not more, if retailers end up as tenants in freestanding, single-owner shopping centres dominated by chain retailers. The group also accuses the Draft Report of brushing aside the concerns of regional towns which do not want to end up with dead town centres.
APTNSW describes the running of a public transport system as a “complex and highly specialised endeavour that requires a deep understanding not only of passenger behaviour, but also the operation of the system as a system. It says the NCP approach is the wrong approach, “assuming that a better outcome for consumers is the intended outcome”. It calls on the Harper Inquiry to resist the urge to break up the system into unconnected separate parts, and to leave public transport to experts in transit network planning.
APTNSW's submission can be seen here.